Subject:
Your Kaluza-Klein second draft PRL
From:
Dan MacQueen 
Date:
Tue, 02 Sep 2003 14:49:16 -0400
To:
burkett@fnal.gov
CC:
smaria@fnal.gov, castro@fnal.gov, williams@williams.hep.upenn.edu, slaughter@fnal.gov

Hi,

[..]  We were all, happy to note that all of our comments we made on the
first draft have been taken into consideration, and look forward to the
publication of this analysis.

The only comment I'd like to make is a minor stylistic comment on the
bottom of page 2 -- since you've assumed that the readers know what things
like t t-bar or p p-bar mean, is it necessary to explicitly state "q and g
are quarks and gluons and G is the graviton"?

 Response
 you are right, we keep it for the sake of the Feynman graph


Thanks again for your work on this analysis,

------------------------------------------------------
Dan MacQueen --- PhD student --- U of Toronto/Fermilab
--- (416)978-6632 -- dmacqueen@physics.utoronto.ca ---
------------------------------------------------------


 Response
 Thanks again for your comments