Dear Colleagues: I've read with pleasure your prl on the Search for KK
Graviton Emission. I have a few minor suggestions with regard to style and
clarity.

Page 1: It's hard to say (a n-torus). I suggest (an n-torus)

Response
OK.  Fixed. 


Page 2 line 3: In the equation m**2 = (p_n)**2 I think that you need to define
	p_n, which if I understand correctly is the magnitude of the momentum
	in the extra dimensions.


Response
Yes, you are correct.  We state it explicitly now. 


Page 2 line 6: I understand "If M_d takes values as low as a few TeV the Higgs
naturalness problem of the standard model can be solved by introducing a 
cutoff not too far above the electroweak scale"  I don't understand the 
following phrase "and the new physics (...) at energies above this cutoff."
It looks like some words are missing.

Response
What we had written was a bit unclear.  It has been rewritten now.



Page 5 lines 2,3: You refer the reader to Figs. 2, 3 but don't draw any 
conclusion from the figures. Presumably you want the reader to see the good
agreement between data and standard model expectations.  

Response
OK.  Fixed. 


Page 6 ref. [5]: "Annu." Doesn't look like the standard abbreviation
Response
OK.  Fixed 

Page 8: You use a different symbol for phi in the figure 2 and its caption.

Response
We assume you are referring to Figure 3.  They are both lower case phis, 
just drawn differently by paw and latex.  We have fixed the difference 
in the deltas. 


Congratulations on a pretty analysis and a well written paper.

				Art Garfinkel

Response
Thenks for your comments and good words.